Understanding Racial Differences in Diagnosing ODD Versus ADHD Using Critical Race Theory

Author:

Ballentine Kess L.1

Affiliation:

1. PhD (cand.), MSW, MA, University of Pittsburgh, PA

Abstract

Although both oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and attention-deficit and hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are associated with poor long-term outcomes, ODD may lead to worse outcomes. While epidemiological literature suggests similar prevalence of ODD and ADHD across racial groups, a review of studies assessing “real-world” diagnostic practice suggests Black children may be over-diagnosed with ODD. Critical race theory (CRT) is applied to determine the etiology and sequelae of a racial effect in diagnostic practice to explain this disparity in findings. Social work practice implications include encouraging examination of professional diagnostic training and procedures for racial bias, active questioning of ODD diagnoses, research to build counter-narratives to that of the dangerous Black child, and advocacy for structural changes to disrupt racism.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Cited by 22 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Editorial: Advances in Clinical Science and Practice Need Research on Implicit Bias;Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry;2024-09

2. Different, Not Deficient: Supporting University and College Students with ADHD in Academic Libraries;The Library Quarterly;2024-07-01

3. Positive Affect Variability is Associated with Homework Management Difficulties in Children with ADHD;Journal of Child and Family Studies;2024-05-15

4. Racial Implicit Associations in Child Psychiatry;Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry;2024-05

5. Emotion AI Use in U.S. Mental Healthcare: Potentially Unjust and Techno-Solutionist;Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction;2024-04-17

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3