Palliative care and other physicians’ knowledge, attitudes and practice relating to the law on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: Survey results

Abstract

Background: To effectively care for people who are terminally ill, including those without decision-making capacity, palliative care physicians must know and understand the legal standing of Advance Care Planning in their jurisdiction of practice. This includes the use of advance directives/living wills and substitute decision-makers who can legally consent to or refuse treatment if there is no valid advance directive. Aim: This study aimed to investigate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of medical specialists most often involved in end-of-life care in relation to the law on withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment from adults without decision-making capacity. Design/participants: A pre-piloted survey was posted to specialists in palliative, emergency, geriatric, renal and respiratory medicine; intensive care; and medical oncology in three Australian States. Surveys were analysed using SPSS 20 and SAS 9.3. Results: The overall response rate was 32% (867/2702) – 52% from palliative care specialists. Palliative care specialists and geriatricians had significantly more positive attitudes towards the law ([Formula: see text]; p < 0.001) and higher levels of knowledge about the withholding/withdrawing life-sustaining treatment law ([Formula: see text]; p < 0.001) than did the other specialists, while still having critical gaps in their knowledge. Conclusion: A high level of knowledge of the law is essential to ensure that patients’ wishes and decisions, expressed through Advance Care Planning, are respected to the maximum extent possible within the law, thereby according with the principles and philosophy of palliative care. It is also essential to protect health professionals from legal action resulting from unauthorised provision or cessation of treatment.