End‐of‐life decision‐making in the emergency department and intensive care unit: Health professionals' perspectives on and knowledge of the law in Queensland

Author:

Hewitt Jayne12ORCID,Alsaba Nemat34,May Katya15,Kang Evelyn1,Cartwright Colleen6,Willmott Lindy7,White Ben78,Marshall Andrea P19

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing and Midwifery Griffith University Southport Queensland Australia

2. Law Futures Centre Griffith University Southport Queensland Australia

3. Emergency Department Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia

4. Faculty of Health Science and Medicine Bond University Robina Queensland Australia

5. Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia

6. Office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor (Research) Southern Cross University Lismore New South Wales Australia

7. Faculty of Business and Law Queensland University of Technology Brisbane Queensland Australia

8. ARC Future Fellow Brisbane Queensland Australia

9. Nursing Education and Research Unit Gold Coast University Hospital Southport Queensland Australia

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveTo investigate ED and intensive care unit healthcare professionals' perspectives and knowledge of the law that underpins end‐of‐life decision‐making in Queensland, Australia.MethodsAn online survey with questions about perspectives, perceived, and actual, knowledge of the law was distributed by the professional organisations of medical practitioners, nurses and social workers who work in Queensland EDs and intensive care units.ResultsThe survey responses of 126 healthcare professionals were included in the final analysis. Most respondents agreed that the law was relevant to end‐of‐life decision‐making, but that clinician and family consensus mattered more than following the law. Generally, doctors' legal knowledge was higher than nurses'; however, there were significant gaps in the knowledge of all respondents about the operation of advance health directives in Queensland.ConclusionsThe legal framework that supports end‐of‐life decision‐making for adults who lack decision‐making capacity has been in place for more than two decades. Despite frequently being involved in making or enacting these decisions, gaps in the legal knowledge of healthcare professionals who work in EDs and intensive care units in Queensland are evident. Further research to better understand how to improve knowledge and application of the law is warranted.

Publisher

Wiley

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3