Regional Study of Care for the Dying: methods and sample characteristics

Author:

Addington-Hall Julia1,McCarthy Mark2

Affiliation:

1. Lecturer in Health Services Research, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London

2. Honorary Senior Lecturer, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London and Director of Public Health, Camden and Islington Health Authority, London

Abstract

The Regional Study of Care for the Dying (RSCD) was established in 1990 with the dual aims of providing district health authorities with an audit of local services for the dying, and of addressing questions about experiences of people dying from cancer, effectiveness of hospice care, and needs of, and appropriate service provision for, people dying from causes other than cancer. The survey methods are described in this paper, together with the characteristics and representativeness of the sample. An interview survey was conducted of family or others who knew about the last year of life of a random sample of people who died in 1990. It was based upon methods used in nationally representative surveys by Cartwright in 1969, and Cartwright and Seale in 1987. The setting was 20 district health authorities, who paid for local data collection. Approximately 270 deaths were randomly sampled in each district: 5375 deaths were sampled in total. As cancer patients are the focus of most services for the dying, cancer deaths were sampled disproportionately (54%). Interviews were obtained for 69% (3696) of the sample. The response rate varied significantly by cause of death, age and social class of deceased, and the degree of deprivation of the district. There were small, but statistically significant, differences in cause of death and age between those deaths for whom interviews were obtained and national figures for deaths occurring in 1990. The discussion addresses key issues in the study, including responses from ethical committees, response rate and quality of data. The survey has been successful, both in providing districts with information on local services, and in obtaining a large, broadly representative, sample of deaths, thus enabling many outstanding questions about the needs of dying patients and their families, and about appropriate service provision, to be addressed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Evaluation of palliative care: steps to quality assurance?

2. 1990 directory of hospice services in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Sydenham, London: St Christopher's Hospice Information Service, 1990.

3. Department of Health. £37 million more for hospices. (Press release 1192/96.) London: DoH, 1992.

4. What happens in hospices: A review of research evidence

Cited by 155 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3