Family carer experiences of hospice care at home: Qualitative findings from a mixed methods realist evaluation

Author:

Abrahamson Vanessa1ORCID,Wilson Patricia1,Barclay Stephen2,Brigden Charlotte13,Gage Heather4,Greene Kay5,Hashem Ferhana1ORCID,Mikelyte Rasa1,Rees-Roberts Melanie1,Silsbury Graham16,Goodwin Mary16,Swash Brooke7,Wee Bee8ORCID,Williams Peter9,Butler Claire1

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Health Services Studies, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK

2. University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

3. Pilgrims Hospices, Canterbury, UK

4. Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

5. Mary Ann Evans Hospice, Nuneaton, UK

6. Lay Author (Member of the Public)

7. University of Chester, Chester, UK

8. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust and Harris Manchester College, Oxford University, Oxford, UK

9. Department of Mathematics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK

Abstract

Background: Hospice-at-home aims to enable patients approaching end-of-life to die at home and support their carers. A wide range of different service models exists but synthesised evidence on how best to support family carers to provide sustainable end-of-life care at home is limited. Aim: To explore what works best to promote family carers’ experiences of hospice-at-home. Design: Realist evaluation with mixed methods. This paper focuses on qualitative interviews with carers (to gain their perspective and as proxy for patients) and service providers from 12 case study sites in England. Interviews were coded and programme theories were refined by the research team including two public members. Setting/participants: Interviews with carers (involved daily) of patients admitted to hospice-at-home services ( n = 58) and hospice-at-home staff ( n = 78). Results: Post bereavement, 76.4% of carers thought that they had received as much help and support as they needed and most carers (75.8%) rated the help and support as excellent or outstanding. Of six final programme theories capturing key factors relevant to providing optimum services, those directly relevant to carer experiences were: integration and co-ordination of services; knowledge, skills and ethos of hospice staff; volunteer roles; support directed at the patient–carer dyad. Conclusions: Carers in hospice-at-home services identified care to be of a higher quality than generic community services. Hospice staff were perceived as having ‘time to care’, communicated well and were comfortable with dying and death. Hands-on care was particularly valued in the period close to death.

Funder

health services and delivery research programme

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. NHS England. Ambitions for Palliative and End of Life Care: a national framework for local action 2021–2026. National Palliative and End of Life Care Partnership, https://www.england.nhs.uk/publication/ambitions-for-palliative-and-end-of-life-care-a-national-framework-for-local-action-2021-2026/ (2021, accessed 13 April 2023).

2. Department of Health. End of Life Care Strategy: promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/end-of-life-care-strategy-promoting-high-quality-care-for-adults-at-the-end-of-their-life (2008, accessed 21 April 2023).

3. World Health Organisation (WHO). Integrating palliative care and symptom relief into primary health care: a WHO guide for planners, implementers and planners, https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/integrating-palliative-care-and-symptom-relief-into-primary-health-care (2018, accessed 19 July 2023).

4. Office for Health Improvement and Disparities. Palliative and End of Life Care place of death factsheets, https://fingertips.phe.org.uk/profile/end-of-life (2023, accessed 14 April 2023).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3