Collective Biography and the Question of Difference

Author:

Gonick Marnina1,Walsh Susan1,Brown Marion2

Affiliation:

1. Mount Saint Vincent University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

2. Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Abstract

This article engages with the research method of collective biography. We are particularly interested in what the question of difference brings to bear on the collective biography process. The aim of embodied writing in the collective biography process is “to tell the memory in such a way that it is vividly imaginable by others, such that those others can extend their own imaginable experience of being in the world through knowing the particularity of another” (Davies & Gannon). However, our own attempt to work with the method had us grappling with how to engage with a story that did not elicit understanding and identification but rather evoked, for some, a sense of incommensurable difference. By bringing together a poststructural concern with power relationships and a Deleuzian interest in engendering new synergies and possibilities, the article makes a theoretical contribution to new conceptual repertoires on the question of difference and its implications for feminist research.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Anthropology

Cited by 25 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Promotion of Labor Insertion Through the Build Your Professional Career (CCP) Model: A Critical Qualitative Perspective for the Improvement of Professional and Life Projects;Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies;2024-05-10

2. Belonging as flickering and in flux in academic work: a collective biography;International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education;2023-09-21

3. Algorithmic autobiographies and fictions: A digital method;The Sociological Review;2023-01-19

4. Intra-Acting With Technology During Remote Fieldwork in Homes: Curating Video Interviews and Drawing Methods;International Journal of Qualitative Methods;2023-01

5. Ficto-feminism*;Historical Female Management Theorists: Frances Perkins, Hallie Flanagan, Madeleine Parent, Viola Desmond;2022-09-30

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3