Long-term effects of a standardized feedback-driven quality improvement program for timely reperfusion therapy in regional STEMI care networks

Author:

Scholz Karl Heinrich1,Lengenfelder Björn23,Jacobshagen Claudius4,Fleischmann Claus5,Moehlis Hiller6,Olbrich Hans G7,Jung Jens8,Maier Lars S9,Maier Sebastian K G310,Bestehorn Kurt11,Friede Tim1213,Meyer Thomas1314

Affiliation:

1. Department of Cardiology, St Bernward Hospital, Hildesheim, Germany

2. Department of Cardiology, University of Würzburg, Germany

3. Comprehensive Heart Failure Center Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany

4. Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

5. Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Wolfsburg, Germany

6. Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany

7. Department of Cardiology, Asklepios Klinik Langen, Langen, Germany

8. Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Worms, Worms, Germany

9. Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany

10. Department of Cardiology, Klinikum Straubing, Straubing, Germany

11. Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

12. Department of Medical Statistics, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

13. German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), partner site Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

14. Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Göttingen, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Aims Current European Society of Cardiology guidelines state that repetitive monitoring and feedback should be implemented for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment, but no evidence is available supporting this recommendation. We aimed to analyze the long-term effects of a formalized data assessment and systematic feedback on performance and mortality within the prospective, multicenter Feedback Intervention and Treatment Times in STEMI (FITT-STEMI) study. Methods Regular interactive feedback sessions with local STEMI management teams were performed at six participating German percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) centers over a 10-year period starting from October 2007. Results From the first to the 10th year of study participation, all predefined key-quality indicators for performance measurement used for feedback improved significantly in all 4926 consecutive PCI-treated patients – namely, the percentages of patients with pre-hospital electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings (83.3% vs 97.1%, p < 0.0001) and ECG recordings within 10 minutes after first medical contact (41.7% vs 63.8%, p < 0.0001), pre-announcement by telephone (77.0% vs 85.4%, p = 0.0007), direct transfer to the catheterization laboratory bypassing the emergency department (29.4% vs 64.2%, p < 0.0001), and contact-to-balloon times of less than 90 minutes (37.2% vs 53.7%, p < 0.0001). Moreover, this feedback-related continuous improvement of key-quality indicators was linked to a significant reduction in in-hospital mortality from 10.8% to 6.8% (p = 0.0244). Logistic regression models confirmed an independent beneficial effect of duration of study participation on hospital mortality (odds ratio = 0.986, 95% confidence interval = 0.976–0.996, p = 0.0087). In contrast, data from a nationwide PCI registry showed a continuous increase in in-hospital mortality in all PCI-treated STEMI patients in Germany from 2008 to 2015 (n = 398,027; 6.7% to 9.2%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions Our results indicate that systematic data assessment and regular feedback is a feasible long-term strategy and may be linked to improved performance and a reduction in mortality in STEMI management.

Funder

German Heart Foundation

Arbeitsgemeinschaft Leitender Kardiologischer Krankenhausärzte

KHS

EUTrigTreat

EU-CERT-ICD

deutsche stiftung für herzforschung

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3