The problem of entanglement: Biases and fallacies in police conflict management

Author:

Staller Mario S1ORCID,Zaiser Benjamin2,Koerner Swen3

Affiliation:

1. (Department of Police,) University of Applied Sciences for Police and Public Administration North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany

2. (Department of Psychological Sciences,) University of Liverpool, UK

3. (Department of Training Pedagogy and Martial Research,) German Sports University, Germany

Abstract

Cognitive biases have been identified as drivers of the excessive use of force, which has determined current affairs across the globe. In this article, we argue that the police are facing serious challenges in combating these biases. These challenges stem from the nature of cognitive biases, their sources and the fallacies that mislead police professionals in the way they think about them. Based on a framework of expert decision-making fallacies and biases, we argue that these fallacies limit the impact of efforts to mitigate cognitive biases in police conflict management. In order to achieve a systemic understanding of cognitive biases and their detrimental effects, the article concludes that implementing reflexive structures within the police is a crucial prerequisite to effectively reflect on external influences and to limit bias and fallacies from further unfolding in a self-referential loop.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Law

Reference96 articles.

1. Abdul-Rahman L, Grau HE, Klaus L et al. (2020) Rassismus und Diskriminierungserfahrungen im Kontext polizeilicher Gewaltausübung. Zweiter Zwischenbericht zum Forschungsprojekt “Körperverletzung im Amt durch Polizeibeamt*innen” (KviAPol) [Racism and Experiences of Discrimination in the Context of Police Violence. Second Interim Report on the Research Project “Assault in Office by Police Officers”]. Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

2. Abdul-Rahman L, Grau HE, Singelnstein T (2019) Polizeiliche Gewaltanwendungen aus Sicht der Betroffenen: Zwischenbericht zum Forschungsprojekt “Körperverletzung im Amt durch Polizeibeamt*innen” (KviAPol) [Police use of force from the perspective of those affected: Interim Report on the Research Project “Assault and Battery by Police Officers” (KviAPol)]. Ruhr-Universität Bochum.

3. Comment on “Cognitive and Human Factors in Expert Decision Making: Six Fallacies and the Eight Sources of Bias”

Cited by 16 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3