Abstract
This article reveals how local knowledge can improve planning for communities facing the most serious environmental and health risks. These communities often draw on their firsthand experience—here called local knowledge—to challenge expert-lay distinctions. Community participation in environmental decisions is putting pressure on planners to find new ways of fusing the expertise of scientists with insights from the local knowledge of communities. Using interviews, primary texts, and ethnographic fieldwork, this article defines local knowledge, reveals how it differs from professional knowledge, and argues that local knowledge can improve planning in at least four ways (1) epistemology, adding to the knowledge base of environmental policy; (2) procedural democracy, including new and previously silenced voices; (3) effectiveness, providing low-cost policy solutions; and (4) distributive justice, highlighting inequitable distributions of environmental burdens.
Subject
Urban Studies,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference28 articles.
1. Dismantling the Divide Between Indigenous and Scientific Knowledge
2. Popular Epidemiology and Toxic Waste Contamination: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing
3. Doing Democracy Up-Close: Culture, Power, and Communication in Community Building
4. Cole, Luke. 1999. The theory and reality of community-based environmental decision making . Ecology Law Quarterly 25: 733-756 .
5. Collin, Robert W., and Robin M. Collin. 1998. The role of communities in environmental decisions: Communities speaking for themselves . Journal of Environmental Law & Litigation 13: 37-89 .
Cited by
247 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献