Affiliation:
1. Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA
2. Kent State University, OH, USA
Abstract
Grassroots associations (GAs) are the “keepers” of collective local knowledge yet uncovering that local knowledge remains challenging for nonprofit researchers. In this study, we propose the utility of reflexivity for nonprofit scholars conducting research aimed at accessing local knowledge within GAs and illustrate its use in practice through collaborative autoethnography (CAE). From block clubs to mutual aid groups, grassroots associations provide a space for members to come together, share insights, build community, and are important repositories of local knowledge. However, GAs remain the “dark matter” of the nonprofit sector—understudied and undertheorized. We discuss the difficulties nonprofit researchers face in accessing the local knowledge of resident within grassroots associations. We then present our CAE methodology and conclude by recommending that scholars interested in accessing local knowledge engage in reflexive praxis attuned to power and positionality. This study contributes to expanding our work with and knowledge of grassroots associations within nonprofit studies.
Reference64 articles.
1. Increasing Minority Research Participation Through Community Organization Outreach
2. The experiential gap in disaster research: Feminist epistemology and the contribution of local affected researchers
3. Using thematic analysis in psychology
4. Brodkey L. (1996). I Site.An essay from a personal narrative that the author has written about herself as a writer and reader. Open Letter: Australian Journal for Adult Literacy Research and Practice, 6(2), 17–30. https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/ielapa.970909191