Effect of subzero-balanced ultrafiltration on postoperative outcome of patients after cardiopulmonary bypass

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of a new ultrafiltration technique — subzero-balanced ultrafiltration technique — on early postoperative outcomes of adult patients undergoing cardiac operations with cardiopulmonary bypass. Methods: A total of 120 patients who required cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac surgery were randomized into two groups, 60 in each group. Patients in the treatment group received subzero-balanced ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass, while patients in the control group received routine cardiopulmonary bypass. Postoperative outcomes, including hospital mortality and morbidity of the two groups, were analyzed. Results: Hospital mortality was 0% (0 of 60) in the treatment group versus 1.8% (1 of 60) in the control group (P=1.000). Total hospital complications was lower in the treated patients (11 of 60 [18.3%] versus 22 of 60 [36.7%], P=0.025). Duration of intubation time was shorter and transfusion volume within 24 hours postoperatively was less in patients having received subzero-balanced ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass (14.35 ± 1.66 versus 18.64 ± 1.57 h, P=0.036 and 1.54 ± 1.56 versus 3.64 ± 2.67 U/patient, P=0.032). Length of stay on the intensive care unit, duration of hospital stay, need for infusion of inotropic agent and drainage volumes within 24 h postoperatively between the two groups were comparable. Conclusions: Subzero-balanced ultrafiltration during cardiopulmonary bypass can effectively decrease the patients’ hospital morbidity and the volume of blood transfusion: it also may promote early postoperative recovery of patients. Routine application of subzero-balanced ultrafiltration during adult cardiac operations should not be necessary, but the technique should be compared to other techniques, e.g. MUF, in further studies.