Minimum infective dose of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 based on the current evidence: A systematic review

Author:

SeyedAlinaghi SeyedAhmad1,Karimi Amirali2,Mojdeganlou Hengameh3,Pashaei Zahra1,Mirzapour Pegah1,Shamsabadi Ahmadreza4,Barzegary Alireza5,Afroughi Fatemeh56,Dehghani Soheil2,Janfaza Nazanin7ORCID,Fakhfouri Amirata5,Khodaei Sepideh1,Mehraeen Esmaeil8ORCID,Dadras Omid9ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Iranian Research Center for HIV/AIDS, Iranian Institute for Reduction of High Risk Behaviors, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

2. School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

3. Department of Pathology, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran

4. Department of Health Information Technology, Esfarayen Faculty of Medical Sciences, Esfarayen, Iran

5. School of Medicine, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

6. Pars Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

7. Internal Medicine Department, Imam Khomeini Hospital Complex, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

8. Department of Health Information Technology, Khalkhal University of Medical Sciences, Khalkhal, Iran

9. Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

Abstract

Objective: Understanding the minimum infective dose is significant for risk assessment in the performance of suitable infection control strategies in healthcare centers. However, the literature lacks strong evidence regarding this value for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the minimum infectious dose of coronavirus disease 2019. Methods: We searched the databases of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane and retrieved all the relevant literature by 25 July 2021. The records were downloaded into the EndNote software and underwent title/abstract and full-text screenings. A summary of included studies was organized into tables for further analysis, interpretation, and drafting of the results. Results: Nineteen studies including the laboratory data on human and animal hosts were selected based on the eligibility criteria. All the literature reported on the infective dose, particularly in humans. The main methods for measurement of infection were through tissue culture infectious dose (TCID50) and counting plaque-forming units. The range of minimum infective was 1.26–7 × 106.25 PFU. Conclusion: In this study, we have presented a range of minimum infective doses in humans and various animal species. Such numbers can possibly vary between the individuals based on numerous demographic, immunologic, or other factors.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Medicine

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3