Using Laddering Interviews and Hierarchical Value Mapping to Gain Insights Into Improving Patient Experience in the Hospital: A Systematic Literature Review

Author:

Kumar Pankaj1ORCID,Follen Michele2,Huang Chi-Cheng1,Cathey Amy3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section on Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kings County Hospital, New York City Health and Hospital Corporation, NY, USA

3. Haslam College of Business, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA

Abstract

Hospitals are continuously facing pressures to mitigate the gap between patient’s expectations and the quality of services provided. Now with Medicare reimbursements tied to Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) scores, institutions are attempting interventions to increase satisfaction scores. However, a standard framework to understand patient values and perceptions and subsequently translate it into reliable measures of patient satisfaction does not exist, particularly in the inpatient settings. This article highlights opportunity for the addition of qualitative customer value research to augment the information providers gain from HCAHPS scores and provide additional indicators that can be used in improving the patient experience. In this article, patient laddering interviews and hierarchical value mapping are reviewed as methodologies to understand patient core satisfaction values during their hospital stay. A systematic literature search was performed to identify articles addressing laddering interviews and hierarchical value mapping as applied to health care. Inclusion criteria involved studies relating to health care and using laddering interviews. Exclusion criteria included non-health-care studies. Only 3 studies were found eligible for this review. Our systematic review of literature revealed only few studies which may help to guide us to improve patient experience using laddering interviews. These interviews can help compose a personalized bedside survey which may be more meaningful than current widely used HCAHPS survey.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference24 articles.

1. Ketelsen L, Cook K, Kennedy B. The HCAHPS Handbook: Tactics to Improve Quality and the Patient Experience. 2nd ed. Pensacola, NC: Fire Starter Pub; 2015.

2. Studer Q. The HCAHPS Handbook: Hardwire Your Hospital for Pay-for-Performance Success. StuderGroup; 2010.

3. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: an analysis of 210 published studies

4. Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research

5. Comparison of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems patient satisfaction scores for specialty hospitals and general medical hospitals: Confounding effect of survey response rate

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3