How Communication “Failed” or “Saved the Day”: Counterfactual Accounts of Medical Errors

Author:

Street Richard L12ORCID,Petrocelli John V3,Amroze Azraa4,Bergelt Corinna5,Murphy Margaret6,Wieting J Michael7,Mazor Kathleen M4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Communication, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA

2. Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA

3. Department of Psychology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, USA

4. Meyers Primary Care Institute, a Joint Endeavor of the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Reliant Medical Group and Fallon Health, Worcester, MA, USA

5. Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

6. Patients for Patient Safety (PFPS), WHO Patients for Patient Safety, Ireland

7. DeBusk College of Osteopathic Medicine, Lincoln Memorial University, Harrogate, TN, USA

Abstract

Communication breakdowns among clinicians, patients, and family members can lead to medical errors, yet effective communication may prevent such mistakes. This investigation examined patients’ and family members’ experiences where they believed communication failures contributed to medical errors or where effective communication prevented a medical error (“close calls”). The study conducted a thematic analysis of open-ended responses to an online survey of patients’ and family members’ past experiences with medical errors or close calls. Of the 93 respondents, 56 (60%) provided stories of medical errors, and the remaining described close calls. Two predominant themes emerged in medical error stories that were attributed to health care providers—information inadequacy (eg, delayed, inaccurate) and not listening to or being dismissive of a patient’s or family member’s concerns. In stories of close calls, a patient’s or family member’s proactive communication (eg, being assertive, persistent) most often “saved the day.” The findings highlight the importance of encouraging active patient/family involvement in a patient’s medical care to prevent errors and of improving systems to provide meaningful information in a timely manner.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy,Health (social science),Leadership and Management

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3