Affiliation:
1. Educational Psychology, Miami University.
2. University of Iowa.
Abstract
Over the last decade, concern has grown regarding the faculty shortage in special education (Sindelar & Rosenberg, 2003). In part as a reaction to a federally funded study conducted in 1999, the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) increased funding for doctoral study in the form of Special Education Leadership Personnel Grants (Gilmore, 2005; Price-Ellingstad, 2005). This paper reports results of a nationwide survey of 619 students from 78 doctoral programs. It compares demographic and background data of current doctoral students to students surveyed in 1999. Results indicate that although the doctoral population does appear to be changing in the direction recommended by researchers in 1999, both contemporary views about doctoral study and the resulting agenda need to be rethought.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Preparing Doctoral Students in Special Education: What Do We Really Know?;Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children;2022-12-14
2. Evaluating the readiness of special education doctoral students to apply the standards of evidence-based practice to single-case research;Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs;2015-03-09
3. The Supply;Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children;2012-04-19
4. The Changing Education Landscape: How Special Education Leadership Preparation Can Make a Difference for Teachers and Their Students With Disabilities;Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children;2010-02
5. What We Know and Need to Know About Teacher Education and Special Education;Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children;2010-02