Affiliation:
1. Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment (CSERGE), University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, U.K.
Abstract
Until recently the disposal option for municipal waste was selected purely on the grounds of financial effectiveness, but now with an increased concern for the environment other criteria such as resource use and environmental impact must also be taken into consideration. The incorporation of a range of different criteria into the decision making process is, however, a formidable task. One potential solution is to use multicriteria evaluation which provides for a systematic appraisal of a number of alternative projects on the basis of a series of criteria. In this study the multicriteria evaluation of six waste disposal options (landfill, incineration and refuse-derived fuel (RDF), each with and without recycling) resulted in RDF with recycling coming out as the best option under a variety of weighting scenarios. Only when a high weighting was put on cost criterion did landfill become the better option. © 1996 ISWA
Subject
Pollution,Environmental Engineering
Reference29 articles.
1. Andreottola, G., Cossu, R. & Serra, R. (1989) A Method for the Assessment of Environmental Impact of Sanitary Landfill. In: Sanitary Landfilling: Process, Technology and Environmental Impact (T. H. Christensen , R. Cossu & R. Stegmann, eds), London, U.K. Academic Press Ltd., pp. 367-389.
2. Multicriteria Evaluation: Measures, Manipulation, and Meaning
3. A Case Study of a Non-Compensatory Approach to Ranking Transportation Projects
Cited by
29 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献