Transient aerodynamic pressures and forces on trackside and overhead structures due to passing trains. Part 1: Model-scale experiments; Part 2: Standards applications

Author:

Baker Christopher1,Jordan Sarah1,Gilbert Timothy1,Quinn Andrew1,Sterling Mark1,Johnson Terry2,Lane John2

Affiliation:

1. Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education, University of Birmingham, UK

2. Rail Safety and Standards Board Ltd, London, UK

Abstract

This is the first part of a two-part paper that describes the results of an experimental investigation to measure the aerodynamic pressure forces on structures in the vicinity of railway tracks. The investigations were carried out in order to obtain a fundamental understanding of the nature of the phenomenon and to obtain data for a variety of railway infrastructure geometries of particular relevance to the UK situation, in order to provide material for a National Annex to the relevant Eurocode. The experiments were carried out on the moving model TRAIN Rig, with models of three different sorts of trains with different nose types, and a variety of infrastructures types: vertical hoardings, overbridges, station canopies and trestle platforms. The transient loads that were measured had a characteristic form: a positive pressure peak followed by a negative pressure peak. In general the magnitudes of the two peaks were different, and varied with infrastructure type and position, as well as with train type. As would be expected, the more streamlined the train, the lower were the magnitudes of the pressure transients. A comparison of the experimental results was made with a variety of existing model- scale and full-scale data and a broad consistency was demonstrated, within the limits that the rather different experimental conditions in the various cases would allow. An analysis of the scaling of these pressure transients was carried out, and it was shown that whilst there was a reasonable coalescence around a theoretical formulation, the complexity of the flows involved meant that a general scaling formulation could not be achieved. Part 2 of this paper will consider the application of the results to the development of revised standards formulations.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Mechanical Engineering

Cited by 37 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3