Abstract
The periphery - defined not only geographically, but also socially (i.e. low socio-economic status) - provided the most significant opposition to Norway's membership of the EU. Normally, the periphery is considered inferior, lacking in strength and influence. However, the Norwegian periphery was strong enough to defeat the centre in the EU referendum. In Sweden and Finland, however, the centre was able to conquer the periphery and became the winner of the referendum concerning membership of the EU. The 'no' majorities in the 1972 and the 1994 referenda are analysed and interpreted according to five different explanations or perspectives: (i) interest explanations, (ii) cultural explanations, (iii) opposing the elite, (iv) the generation perspective and (v) Rokkan and Valen's cleavage model.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science
Reference18 articles.
1. Aardal, B. 1995. Ideologi på tvers? In A. T.Jenssen & H. Valen (eds.), Brussel midt imot, Folkeavstemningen om EU , pp.165-184. Oslo: ad Notam Gyldendal.
2. The Three Nordic 1994 Referenda Concerning Membership in the EU
3. Patriarchy in a Welfare Society.;Hernes, H.,1984
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Place-based resentment in an egalitarian welfare state;Political Geography;2024-08
2. Accession versus Exit: European Union’s Size Issue Throughout The Decades;Aksaray Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi;2021-02-19
3. Referendums: Norway 1972 and 1994;The Palgrave Handbook of European Referendums;2021
4. Notes;Cold Wars;2020-03-19
5. Norwegian Euroscepticism: Values, Identity or Interest*;JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies;2012-04-05