Abstract
The three Nordic referenda held in 1994 ended with Finland and Sweden inside and Norway outside the EU. Despite different outcomes, there are similarities in public opinion in the three countries regarding EU membership. The trend in opinion development from the beginning of the 1990s to the autumn of 1994 was the same, support for membership dropping in all three countries. Consequently, an international component could be observed. The most visible similarity, however, was the regional contrast — a south-north axis — with the stronghold of the opponents of membership in the rural areas in the north. A centre-periphery conflict appeared. The peripheries — defined not only geographically, but also socially (i.e. low socio-economic status) — were primarily in opposition to membership. However, the strengths of the peripheries vary. In Finland and Sweden the centre defeated the periphery, whereas in Norway the periphery defeated the centre. The strength of the Norwegian periphery is interpreted with reference to `political culture' as well as `self-interest' factors.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations
Cited by
18 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. EU Accession Referendums;The Palgrave Handbook of European Referendums;2021
2. The EFTA Enlargement;The Palgrave Handbook of European Referendums;2021
3. Referendum Practice in Sweden;The Politics of Referendum Use in European Democracies;2019
4. The Lutheran Intergovernmentalism of Norway;The Political Theology of European Integration;2017
5. Theology and Integration;The Political Theology of European Integration;2017