The Choice of a Noninformative Prior on Between-Study Variance Strongly Affects Predictions of Future Treatment Effect

Author:

Gajic-Veljanoski Olga12345,Cheung Angela M.12345,Bayoumi Ahmed M.12345,Tomlinson George12345

Affiliation:

1. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (OG-V, AMC, AMB, GT)

2. Osteoporosis Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (OG-V, AMC)

3. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (GT)

4. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (AMC, AMB, GT)

5. Centre for Research on Inner City Health, The Keenan Research Centre in the Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (AMB)

Abstract

Purpose. Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses require the analyst to specify the prior distribution for between-study variance of the treatment effect. We assessed the sensitivity of prediction and other outputs of the meta-analysis to the choice of this prior. Methods. We reanalyzed 7 published meta-analyses (5–14 trials) with rare (event rates <5%), moderate (15%–50%), and frequent binary outcomes (>50%). We examined 10 noninformative priors: inverse gamma on between-study variance ( τ2), 2 uniforms on each of the between-study standard deviation ( τ) and τ2, uniform shrinkage on τ2, DuMouchel shrinkage on τ, half-normal on τ2, and half-normal priors on τ with large and small variances. For each analysis, we calculated the posterior distributions for τ, the population treatment effect in current studies, and the predicted treatment effect in a future study. We assessed goodness of fit using total residual deviance, the deviance information criterion, and predictive deviance (by cross-validations). Results. According to total residual deviance, the best-fitting priors were uniform on τ2. According to predictive deviance, half-normal on τ2 and the shrinkage priors were optimal. Across analyses with the 10 priors, there were no important differences in the posteriors for the population treatment effect, but there were substantial differences in the posteriors for τ and predictions. The priors that fitted best according to predictive deviance resulted in less uncertainty around predictions of future treatment effect. Conclusions. In this sample of Bayesian meta-analyses with binary outcomes, the choice of noninformative prior for between-study variance affected model fit and the predictions of future treatment effect. When the predictive distribution is of interest, we highly recommend examination of multiple prior distributions for between-study variance, especially the half-normal on τ2 and the shrinkage priors.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3