Affiliation:
1. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA
2. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, China
Abstract
This article examines the influence of bureaucratic structure on a public employee’s sense of inclusion. We argue that bureaucratic structure influences inclusion by accentuating or minimizing status differences. To test this argument, we investigate three types of bureaucratic structure: centralization, hierarchy, and span of control, all expected to lower inclusion, and “green tape,” or effective organizational rules, expected to increase inclusion. To test these expectations, we use quantitative and qualitative survey data, as well as administrative data collected from the employees of 31 departments in a county government in the Southeastern United States. Findings indicate that higher centralization and wider span of control reduce inclusion, whereas green tape increases inclusion. Hierarchy shows no statistically significant inclusion effect. The article concludes with the implications of these results of public sector organizational design.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Public Administration
Reference67 articles.
1. Accominotti F., Lynn F., Sauder M. (2022). The architecture of status hierarchies: Variations in structure and why they matter for inequality. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 8(6), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.05
2. Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis
3. The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy
4. Representation and Inclusion in Public Organizations: Evidence from the U.K. Civil Service
5. Centralization, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献