Does Bureaucracy Diminish Inclusion? Evidence from a County Government

Author:

DeHart-Davis Leisha1ORCID,Dickerson Kimalee1,Jiang Zhongnan2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA

2. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, China

Abstract

This article examines the influence of bureaucratic structure on a public employee’s sense of inclusion. We argue that bureaucratic structure influences inclusion by accentuating or minimizing status differences. To test this argument, we investigate three types of bureaucratic structure: centralization, hierarchy, and span of control, all expected to lower inclusion, and “green tape,” or effective organizational rules, expected to increase inclusion. To test these expectations, we use quantitative and qualitative survey data, as well as administrative data collected from the employees of 31 departments in a county government in the Southeastern United States. Findings indicate that higher centralization and wider span of control reduce inclusion, whereas green tape increases inclusion. Hierarchy shows no statistically significant inclusion effect. The article concludes with the implications of these results of public sector organizational design.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Management of Technology and Innovation,Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management,Strategy and Management,Public Administration

Reference67 articles.

1. Accominotti F., Lynn F., Sauder M. (2022). The architecture of status hierarchies: Variations in structure and why they matter for inequality. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 8(6), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.7758/RSF.2022.8.6.05

2. Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis

3. The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy

4. Representation and Inclusion in Public Organizations: Evidence from the U.K. Civil Service

5. Centralization, Organizational Strategy, and Public Service Performance

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3