Bone Ablation without Thermal or Acoustic Mechanical Injury via a Novel Picosecond Infrared Laser (PIRL)

Author:

Jowett Nathan123,Wöllmer Wolfgang2,Reimer Rudolph4,Zustin Jozef5,Schumacher Udo6,Wiseman Paul W.7,Mlynarek Alex M.1,Böttcher Arne2,Dalchow Carsten V.2,Lörincz Balazs B.2,Knecht Rainald2,Miller R. J. Dwayne3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Canada

2. Department of Oto-, Rhino-, Laryngology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

3. Atomically Resolved Dynamics Division, Max Planck Research Department for Structural Dynamics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany

4. Heinrich Pette Institute - Leibniz Institute for Experimental Virology, Hamburg, Germany

5. Department of Pathology, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

6. Institute of Anatomy and Experimental Morphology, University Cancer Center, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany

7. Departments of Chemistry and Physics, McGill University, Quebec, Canada

Abstract

Background and Objective A precise means to cut bone without significant thermal or mechanical injury has thus far remained elusive. A novel non-ionizing ultrafast pulsed picosecond infrared laser (PIRL) may provide the solution. Tissue ablation with the PIRL occurs via a photothermal process with thermal and stress confinement, resulting in efficient material ejection greatly enhanced through front surface spallation photomechanical effects. By comparison, the Er:YAG laser (EYL) ablates via photothermal and cavitation-induced photomechanical effects without thermal or acoustic confinement, leading to significant collateral tissue injury. This study compared PIRL and EYL bone ablation by infrared thermography (IRT), environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM), and histology. Study Design Prospective, comparative, ex vivo animal model. Setting Optics laboratory. Subjects and Methods Ten circular area defects were ablated in ex vivo chicken humeral cortex using PIRL and EYL at similar average power (~70 mW) under IRT. Following fixation, ESEM and undecalcified light microscopy images were obtained and examined for signs of cellular injury. Results Peak rise in surface temperature was negligible and lower for PIRL (1.56°C; 95% CI, 0.762-2.366) compared to EYL ablation (12.99°C; 95% CI, 12.189-13.792) ( P < .001). ESEM and light microscopy demonstrated preserved cortical microstructure following PIRL ablation in contrast to diffuse thermal injury seen with EYL ablation. Microfractures were not observed. Conclusion Ablation of cortical bone using the PIRL generates negligible and significantly less heat than EYL ablation while preserving cortical microstructure. This novel laser has great potential in advancing surgical techniques where precision osseous manipulation is required.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Surgery

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3