Affiliation:
1. Arizona State University
Abstract
In a three-path mediational model, two mediators intervene in a series between an independent and a dependent variable. Methods of testing for mediation in such a model are generalized from the more often used single-mediator model. Six such methods are introduced and compared in a Monte Carlo study in terms of their Type I error, power, and coverage. Based on its results, the joint significance test is preferred when only a hypothesis test is of interest. The percentile bootstrap and bias-corrected bootstrap are preferred when a confidence interval on the mediated effect is desired, with the latter having more power but also slightly inflated Type I error in some conditions.
Subject
Management of Technology and Innovation,Strategy and Management,General Decision Sciences
Reference45 articles.
1. Aiken, L.S., Gerend, M.A. & Jackson, K.M. (2001). Subjective risk and health protective behavior: Cancer screening and cancer prevention. In A. Baum, T. Revenson, & J. Singer (Eds). Handbook of Health Psychology (pp. 727-746). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Test of a mediated performance–turnover relationship highlighting the moderating roles of visibility and reward contingency.
3. The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis
Cited by
925 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献