Affiliation:
1. CONICET- Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata,
Argentina,
Abstract
Based on an analysis of how an ethnographic research project was received by ‘experts’ in the field, a series of reflections will be put forward on ethnographic fieldwork and some aspects of anthropological knowledge. Developed on the assumption that the vicissitudes of ethnographic practice are central to the process of knowing the ‘Other’, this reflexive exercise focuses on how informants may turn into either the ethnographer’s saboteurs or his/her contributors — and even co-authors. As spaces in the academic arena are shared — and somehow disputed — extremely conflictive relationships spring raising fears in the ethnographer, who may suffer direct sabotages in his experience on the field.
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献