Revealing the hidden performances of social work practice: The ethnographic process of gaining access, getting into place and impression management

Author:

Leigh Jadwiga1ORCID,Disney Tom2,Warwick Lisa3,Ferguson Harry4,Beddoe Liz5ORCID,Cooner Tarsem S6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Sociology Department, Lancaster University, UK

2. Department of Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, UK

3. Law and Social Sciences, University of Nottingham, UK

4. Department of Social Work and Social Care, University of Birmingham, UK

5. Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Auckland, UK

6. University of Birmingham, UK

Abstract

Whilst the empirical process of research highlights substantive findings, understanding the methodological approach in which access is gained and sustained on field sites is also an integral part of the data. Gaining access in ethnographic studies, in particular, is a complex task which requires researchers to continually negotiate systems and processes in order that they may reflect on the socially embedded practices of their chosen fields. However, once the researchers are accepted, the ethnographer then has to be aware of the effect their presence has on the field and that access is a continual process of negotiation and contestation. Based on a longitudinal study, which conducted a 15-month ethnography in two social work organizations, this article will explore the dilemmas various members of a research team experienced when trying to blend into the different sites. And then, once having achieved their desired position, the challenges they encountered when they realized that their presence was affecting the performances of their participants. We conclude by discussing the importance of reflexivity, power and ethics. Ethnographic research may be a more natural way for researchers to collect data, but it is also a method which positions researchers in situations, where they can easily influence encounters and, in effect, become part of the findings as well.

Funder

ESRC National Centre for Research Methods, University of Southampton

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Health(social science)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3