Abstract
Mounting criticism of special education policy and practices has resulted in controversial recommendations for reform that often appeal to the questionable authority of the National Academy of Sciences' report (Heller at al., 1982). Until now, there has been little response to this frequently cited report from a special education perspective. The present article discusses a theory of tolerance and seeks to identify the critical problems associated with the position taken in the NAS report and subsequent reform initiatives. Specifically, it is argued that brute force attempts to absorb, current special education functions into regular classrooms will necessarily fail. Regular classroom teachers, confronting often extreme variability in students' learning characteristics, cannot be equally effective with difficult-to-teach students without either substantial increases in usable instructional resources or adoption of powerful instructional technologies.
Subject
Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
53 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Adverse Childhood Experiences;Research Anthology on Interventions in Student Behavior and Misconduct;2022-06-03
2. Adverse Childhood Experiences;Advances in Psychology, Mental Health, and Behavioral Studies;2022
3. Assessing Teacher Opinion on the Inclusion of Children with Social, Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties into Mainstream School Classes;International Journal of Disability, Development and Education;2018-05-09
4. Parsing Disciplinary Disproportionality;American Educational Research Journal;2014-08
5. Disproportional representation of minorities in special education;Journal for Multicultural Education;2014-06-03