An Examination of Interstate Differences in Eligibility Criteria for Deafblindness

Author:

Travers Hilary E.1ORCID,Schles Rachel Anne1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Peabody College of Education and Human Development, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA

Abstract

Introduction: This study examined the interstate variability in eligibility criteria for the disability category of deafblindness. Methods: We systematically reviewed and coded information related to the location of state data, the use of federal language in state definitions, additional eligibility criteria (i.e., disability eligibility requirements, evaluative components), and required eligibility team members (i.e., specific school staff mentioned by profession to be present for eligibility determinations) for every U.S. state and territory, including Washington, DC. Results: We located deafblind eligibility data for 54 of 56 states. Thirty-one states provided an operationalized definition of deafblindness that included additional eligibility criteria. Seventeen states required students to first be found eligible as having visual and hearing impairments before they could be considered deafblind. Very few states required any eligibility team members with knowledge of sensory impairments or communication disorders to determine deafblind eligibility. Discussion: The findings of this work suggest there is large interstate variability in eligibility criteria for deafblindness. A universal operational definition of deafblindness with defined eligibility criteria may be necessary to ensure consistency in identification and access to appropriate personnel and services across states. Implications for Practitioners: Understanding the eligibility requirements in each state is critical to helping appropriately identify qualifying students with deafblindness. Practitioners should advocate for the identification of deafblind students by keeping any sensory-related information at the forefront of all eligibility discussions.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Rehabilitation,Ophthalmology

Reference16 articles.

1. Alabama Administrative Code. Ala. Admin. Code r. 290- 8-9-03.

2. Impact of Co-Occurring Birth Defects on the Timing of Newborn Hearing Screening and Diagnosis

3. Delaware Administrative Code. 14 Del Admin. C. § 925.6.8

4. Dragoo K. E. (2020, October 12). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: A comparison of state eligibility criteria (CRS Report No. R46566). https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46566#:∼:text = A%20Comparison%20of%20State%20Eligibility%20Criteria,The%20Individuals%20with&text = States%20must%20submit%20a%20plan,and%20(2)%20evaluating%20them.

5. How Variable are Interstate Prevalence Rates of Learning Disabilities and other Special Education Categories? A Longitudinal Comparison

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3