A Comparison of Three Popular Methods for Handling Missing Data: Complete-Case Analysis, Inverse Probability Weighting, and Multiple Imputation

Author:

Little Roderick J.1ORCID,Carpenter James R.23,Lee Katherine J.4

Affiliation:

1. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

2. Department of Medical Statistics, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK

3. MRC Clinical Trials Unit, UCL, UK

4. Murdoch Children’s Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital, Melbourne, Australia

Abstract

Missing data are a pervasive problem in data analysis. Three common methods for addressing the problem are (a) complete-case analysis, where only units that are complete on the variables in an analysis are included; (b) weighting, where the complete cases are weighted by the inverse of an estimate of the probability of being complete; and (c) multiple imputation (MI), where missing values of the variables in the analysis are imputed as draws from their predictive distribution under an implicit or explicit statistical model, the imputation process is repeated to create multiple filled-in data sets, and analysis is carried out using simple MI combining rules. This article provides a non-technical discussion of the strengths and weakness of these approaches, and when each of the methods might be adopted over the others. The methods are illustrated on data from the Youth Cohort (Time) Series (YCS) for England, Wales and Scotland, 1984–2002.

Funder

UK Medical Research Council

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)

Reference45 articles.

1. A Review of Hot Deck Imputation for Survey Non-response

2. Asymptotically Unbiased Estimation of Exposure Odds Ratios in Complete Records Logistic Regression

3. Missing Data: What a Little Can Do, and What Researchers Can Do in Response

4. Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data

5. Carpenter James R., Kenward Michael G. 2008. “Missing Data in Clinical Trials – a Practical Guide.” National Health Service Co-ordinating Centre for Research Methodology, url = https://researchonline.lshtm.ac.uk/id/eprint/4018500/.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3