Postoperative Patient-Controlled Thoracic Epidural Analgesia: Importance of Dose Compared to Volume or Concentration

Author:

Dernedde M.1,Stadler M.1,Taviaux N.1,Boogaerts J. G.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Centre, Charleroi, Belgium

Abstract

This randomised and blinded study evaluated the quality of analgesia and the incidence of side-effects of two concentrations of levobupivacaine (0.15% and 0.5%) given as an equal mg-bolus-dose (5 mg) via patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lower abdominal surgery. The patients were randomly assigned into two groups to receive either 0.15% levobupivacaine as a 3.3 ml bolus on demand, with a lockout interval of 30 minutes (n = 30), or 0.5% levobupivacaine as a 1 ml bolus on demand, with a similar lockout interval (n = 30). For both groups we combined the bolus on demand with a background infusion of 5 mg/hour levobupivacaine, i.e. 3.3 ml/hour 0.15% or 1 ml/hour 0.5% of levobupivacaine. The epidural catheters were inserted in a lower thoracic intervertebral space before induction of general anaesthesia. The following variables were registered in the 48 hours after surgery: upper and lower sensory block, pain scores at rest and after coughing, rescue morphine consumption, motor blockade, haemodynamic (arterial blood pressure and heart rate), nausea and vomiting, and patient satisfaction ratings. The two groups had similar sensory block, quality of analgesia, rescue morphine consumption requirement, motor blockade and side-effects, and both had a high satisfaction rate. These findings indicate that administering the same dose of levobupivacaine in either a low or high concentration via the patient-controlled epidural analgesia mode, combined with a background infusion, provides an equal quality of analgesia for low thoracic level epidurals with no difference in the incidence of side-effects.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3