Using Personal Qualities Assessment to Measure the Moral Orientation and Personal Qualities of Medical Students in a Non-Western Culture

Author:

Tsou Kuo-Inn12,Lin Chaou-Shune13,Cho Shu-Ling1,Powis David4,Bore Miles4,Munro Don4,Sze Daniel Man-Yuen5,Wu Hsi-Chin6,Hsieh Ming-Shium7,Lin Chyi-Her8

Affiliation:

1. College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan

2. Department of Pediatrics, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan

3. Catholic Mercy Hospital, Hsinchu County, Taiwan

4. School of Psychology, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia

5. Herbal Medicines Research and Education Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

6. College of Medicine, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan

7. College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

8. College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University and Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan

Abstract

How to select candidates with appropriate personal qualities for medical school is an important issue. This study examined the psychometric properties and group differences of the Personal Qualities Assessment (PQA) to test the feasibility of using it as a tool to assess the medical school applicants in a non-Western culture. Seven hundred forty-six medical students in Taiwan completed two psychometric measures: Mojac to assess moral orientation and NACE to assess four aspects of interpersonal relationships. Thirty-one students completed the tests twice to establish test–retest reliability. A subsample of 127 students also completed a measure of the “Big Five” personality traits to examine the construct validity of these scales. Both Mojac and NACE had acceptable internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Conceptually, coherent and significant relationships were observed between test components and between the NACE and Big Five. NACE but not Mojac varied significantly between different sociodemographic groups. Both tests demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties. However, the predictive validity of PQA requires future studies.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Health Policy

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3