Affiliation:
1. Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
Abstract
This analysis examines federal legislation offering potential benefits for populations living with rare disease. More than 6,000 diseases are defined “rare” by prevalence of less than 200,000 in the United States. Rare disease carries more than symptom burdens; psychosocial implications resulting from low prevalence, complex genetic etiology, and potential inheritability add further load. Health care systems add psychosocial, morbidity, and disability burden resulting from disparities in access to affordable drugs, therapeutic discovery, clinical best practices and surveillance development, provider competency, and timely diagnosis. The Orphan Drug and Rare Disease Acts specifically targets research strategies to benefit rare disease, whereas the Genetic Information Nondisclosure Act (GINA) addresses economic risks of living with genetic rare conditions. Policy content and literature discussion demonstrate broader policy articulation is needed to prioritize research and solutions for health disparity and its consequences for the collective rare disease community. The Health Disparity Research and Education Act is relevant to future rare disease policy development and nursing action.
Subject
General Medicine,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Leadership and Management
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献