Diversity and neocolonialism in Big Data research: Avoiding extractivism while struggling with paternalism

Author:

Helm Paula1ORCID,de Götzen Amalia2ORCID,Cernuzzi Luca3ORCID,Hume Alethia3,Diwakar Shyam4ORCID,Ruiz Correa Salvador5,Gatica-Perez Daniel6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Media Studies, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

2. Faculty of Engineering and Science, Department of Architecture Design and Media Technology, Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark

3. Universidad Catolica Nuestra Senora de la Asunción in Paraguay, Asuncion, Paraguay

4. Amrita Mind Brain Center, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, TN, India

5. Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica, Potosi, Mexico

6. Idiap Research Institute and Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Martygni, Valais, Switzerland

Abstract

The extractive logic of Big Data-driven technology and knowledge production has raised serious concerns. While most criticism initially focused on the impacts on Western societies, attention is now increasingly turning to the consequences for communities in the Global South. To date, debates have focused on private-sector activities. In this article, we start from the conviction that publicly funded knowledge and technology production must also be scrutinized for their potential neocolonial entanglements. To this end, we analyze the dynamics of collaboration in an European Union-funded research project that collects data for developing a social platform focused on diversity. The project includes pilot sites in China, Denmark, the United Kingdom, India, Italy, Mexico, Mongolia, and Paraguay. We present the experience at four field sites and reflect on the project’s initial conception, our collaboration, challenges, progress, and results. We then analyze the different experiences in comparison. We conclude that while we have succeeded in finding viable strategies to avoid contributing to the dynamics of unilateral data extraction as one side of the neocolonial circle, it has been infinitely more difficult to break through the much more subtle but no less powerful mechanisms of paternalism that we find to be prevalent in data-driven North–South relations. These mechanisms, however, can be identified as the other side of the neocolonial circle.

Funder

European Commission

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Library and Information Sciences,Information Systems and Management,Computer Science Applications,Communication,Information Systems

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. How platform power undermines diversity-oriented innovation;Internet Policy Review;2024-06-26

2. On Epistemic Extractivism and the Ethics of Data-Sharing;Philosophy of the Social Sciences;2024-05-22

3. ChatGPT and accounting in African contexts: Amplifying epistemic injustice;Critical Perspectives on Accounting;2024-03

4. Diversity and language technology: how language modeling bias causes epistemic injustice;Ethics and Information Technology;2024-01-27

5. Governing AI, governing climate change?;Geo: Geography and Environment;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3