Diversity and language technology: how language modeling bias causes epistemic injustice

Author:

Helm PaulaORCID,Bella Gábor,Koch Gertraud,Giunchiglia Fausto

Abstract

AbstractIt is well known that AI-based language technology—large language models, machine translation systems, multilingual dictionaries, and corpora—is currently limited to three percent of the world’s most widely spoken, financially and politically backed languages. In response, recent efforts have sought to address the “digital language divide” by extending the reach of large language models to “underserved languages.” We show how some of these efforts tend to produce flawed solutions that adhere to a hard-wired representational preference for certain languages, which we call language modeling bias. Language modeling bias is a specific and under-studied form of linguistic bias were language technology by design favors certain languages, dialects, or sociolects with respect to others. We show that language modeling bias can result in systems that, while being precise regarding languages and cultures of dominant powers, are limited in the expression of socio-culturally relevant notions of other communities. We further argue that at the root of this problem lies a systematic tendency of technology developer communities to apply a simplistic understanding of diversity which does not do justice to the more profound differences that languages, and ultimately the communities that speak them, embody. Drawing on the concept of epistemic injustice, we point to the broader ethico-political implications and show how it can lead not only to a disregard for valuable aspects of diversity but also to an under-representation of the needs of marginalized language communities. Finally, we present an alternative socio-technical approach that is designed to tackle some of the analyzed problems.

Funder

EU

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Reference69 articles.

1. Agirre, E., & Edmonds, P. (2007). Word sense disambiguation: Algorithms and applications. Springer.

2. Aradau, C., & Blanke, T. (2022). Algorithmic reason: The new government of self and other. Oxford University Press.

3. Arora, P. (2016). Bottom of the data pyramid: Big data and the global south. International Journal of Communication, 10(1), 1–19.

4. Arora, P. (2019). The next billion users: Digital life beyond the west. Harvard University Press.

5. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2016). Big data’s disparate impact. California Law Review, 104(3), 671–732.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Kant on public reason and the linguistic Other;Asian Journal of Philosophy;2024-08-20

2. Layers of technology in pluriversal design decolonising language technology with the live language initiative;CoDesign;2024-07-29

3. Tackling Language Modelling Bias in Support of Linguistic Diversity;The 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency;2024-06-03

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3