Affiliation:
1. University of Wisconsin, Madison, USA
Abstract
Educational policy in a number of nations has stressed the importance of STEM and advanced mathematics. This article examines Andrew Hacker’s analysis of the uncritical acceptance of STEM and advanced mathematics and of its empirical, epistemological, political, and educational assumptions. Although I support Hacker’s claims, I also raise a number of questions about some of his own assumptions and arguments. On the whole, however, The Math Myth is an important book, one that should be read by both supporters of STEM in curriculum and teaching and by those who are deeply concerned about its dominance.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. STEM Education and the Contradictory Realities of School Policies: An Essay Review of Eisenhart, M. A., & Weis, L. (2022). STEM Education Reform in Urban High Schools: Opportunities, Constraints, Culture, and Outcomes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press;Educational Policy;2023-05-25
2. STEM, Educational Transformation, and the Politics of Race An Essay Review of Ebony Omotola McGee (2020). Black, brown, bruised: How racialized STEM education stifles innovation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press. pp. 190. ISBN 978-1-68253-535-6;Educational Policy;2020-12-24
3. MySkillsFuture for Students, STEM Learning, and the Design of Neoliberal Citizenship in Singapore;Stem and the Social Good;2020-12-17
4. MySkillsFuture for Students, STEM Learning, and the Design of Neoliberal Citizenship in Singapore;Cognition and Instruction;2019-06-17