Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)

Author:

Bjerke Susanna Memmen12,Feragen Kristin Billaud3,Bergvik Svein1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychology, UiT—The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

2. Department of Speech and Language Disorders, Statped Sørøst, Oslo, Norway

3. Centre for Rare Disorders, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway

Abstract

Objective: Informant discrepancies on psychological measures may affect the assessment, classification, and treatment of children’s mental health. Concordance between different informants has been shown to be low to moderately correlated. The present study examined the agreement between children with cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and their parents. Design: Cross-sectional data from 7 consecutive birth cohorts based on routine psychological assessments at age 10 with comparisons to national reference groups. Setting: Centralized and multidisciplinary treatment setting. Participants: 323 children age 10, born with CL/P and their parents (participation rate: 89%). Outcome measures: Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). Results: Children born with CL/P and their parents tend to follow similar patterns of disagreement on the SDQ as reported in the general population, with children reporting more symptoms than their parents, and boys having more problems than girls on most subscales. Child and parent reports were low to moderately correlated, and not affected by the child’s gender or the presence of conditions additional to the cleft. Conclusions: Differences between informants on the SDQ reflect different perspectives of the child’s adjustment, and both informants are important in the assessment of mental health. Children with CL/P and their parents do not significantly differ from children and parents in the general population on their agreement of the child’s psychological adjustment. As with the general population, clinical assessments should be based on a mixture of both informants’ reports.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Otorhinolaryngology,Oral Surgery

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3