Differences and relationship between velocity attained at VO2max and time trial performances in Para athletes with vision impairment and their guides

Author:

Winckler Ciro1ORCID,Costa Shaeny Gomes da2,Campos Luis Felipe Castelli Correia de3,Lourenço Thiago Fernando4

Affiliation:

1. São Paulo Federal University (UNIFESP), Brazil

2. The National Service of Commerce Santos, Brazil

3. Universidad del Bio-Bio, Chile

4. Brazilian Paralympic Committee, Brazil

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the relationship and difference between velocity attained at maximal oxygen consumption (vVO2max) and 1000-m time trials in Para athletes with vision impairment and their guides. This study had seven Para athletes of class T11 (six Paralympic Games medalists and one non-medalist) and seven respective guides who performed an incremental treadmill test and 1000-m time trial on the athletics track. Data normality was checked through the Shapiro-Wilk test, Student t test, and effect size (ES) to compare differences between groups, and the association between vVO2max and time trial mean velocity (vTT) was made through linear regression. No differences were observed ( p = .555, ES: 0.236) in the VO2max of the T11 athletes (49.29 ± 9.25 ml kg−1 min−1) and their respective guides (51.30 ± 8.92 ml kg−1 min−1), as well as in the vVO2max (T11 athlete: 18.14 ± 3.53 km h−1, guide: 19.00 ± 2.52 km h−1, p = .585, ES: 0.218) and vTT (T11 athlete: 17.25 ± 3.57 km h−1, guide: 20.12 ± 2.25 km h−1, p = .100, ES: 0.735). However, the linear regression analysis between vVO2max and vTT revealed a positive and moderate relationship in T11 athletes (R2 = 0.684, p < .01) and a very large guide (R2 = 0.774, p < .01). The speed reserve of the guide in relation to the T11 athlete was 16%. The results of vTT underestimate the vVO2max more in guides than in T11 athletes.

Funder

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3