Content and face validity of quality-of-life instruments for youth with visual impairments: A Delphi study

Author:

Beach Pamela1ORCID,Brian Ali2,Sniatecki Jessica1

Affiliation:

1. State University of New York Brockport, USA

2. University of South Carolina, USA

Abstract

Youth with visual impairments (VI) who are physically active are more likely to have higher quality of life (QoL) outcomes, however, typically have higher levels of sedentary time and decreased motor competence, health-related fitness, and physical activity levels than their sighted peers. A major challenge in examining the relationship between QoL and physical activity among children with VI is a lack of psychometrically vetted assessment instruments. The purpose of this Delphi study was to explore the preliminary content and face validity for two measures of QoL for youth with VI by achieving expert consensus on the items of the PedsQL™ and the revised HEAR-QL (now named VISION-QL) survey. A panel of 11 experts in VI assessed each item of the PedsQL™ and VISION-QL on the appropriateness for youth with VI and overall clarity using a 4-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 ( completely disagree) to 4 ( completely agree). In addition, experts provided feedback on whether the revised questions maintained the meaning from the original question. Panelists were instructed to provide feedback for scores below 3 regarding how to improve the clarity or appropriateness of the item. Items with a median score below 3.25 and 70% agreement were revised and then distributed to the expert panel for a second assessment using the same Likert-type scale and instructions to leave comments for scores below 3. Thirty-four questions were revised for the VISION-QL survey from the HEAR-QL survey. Both instruments reached consensus following two rounds. The results of this study feature the first initial vettings for two separate QoL measures evaluated specifically for ecological validity for individuals with VI. Practitioners can now choose depending upon who their target audience is (e.g., child vs. caregiver) and can do so with confidence.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3