Pragmatic guidance for embedding pragmatic clinical trials in health plans: Large simple trials aren’t so simple

Author:

Cocoros Noelle M1ORCID,Gurwitz Jerry H2,Cziraky Mark J3,Granger Christopher B4,Harkins Thomas5,Haynes Kevin6,Li Xiaojuan1,Parlett Lauren3,Seeger John D7,Singh Sonal2,McMahill-Walraven Cheryl N8,Platt Richard1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, MA, USA

2. Meyers Health Care Institute, A Joint Endeavor of UMass Chan Medical School, Reliant Medical Group and Fallon Health, Worcester, MA, USA

3. HealthCore, Inc., Wilmington, DE, USA

4. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA

5. Humana Healthcare Research, Inc., Louisville, KY, USA

6. Janssen Research & Development, Titusville, PA, USA

7. Optum Epidemiology, Boston, MA, USA

8. CVS Health Clinical Trial Services, Blue Bell, PA, USA

Abstract

Background: There are unique opportunities related to the design and conduct of pragmatic trials embedded in health insurance plans, which have longitudinal data on member/patient demographics, dates of coverage, and reimbursed medical care, including prescription drug dispensings, vaccine administrations, behavioral healthcare encounters, and some laboratory results. Such trials can be large and efficient, using these data to identify trial-eligible patients and to ascertain outcomes. Methods: We use our experience primarily with the National Institutes of Health Pragmatic Trials Collaboratory Distributed Research Network, which comprises health plans that participate in the US Food & Drug Administration’s Sentinel System, to describe lessons learned from the conduct and planning of embedded pragmatic trials. Results: Information is available for research on more than 75 million people with commercial or Medicare Advantage health plans. We describe three studies that have used or plan to use the Network, as well as a single health plan study, from which we glean our lessons learned. Conclusions: Studies that are conducted in health plans provide much-needed evidence to drive clinically meaningful changes in care. However, there are many unique aspects of these trials that must be considered in the planning, implementation, and analytic phases. The type of trial best suited for studies embedded in health plans will be those that require large sample sizes, simple interventions that could be disseminated through health plans, and where data available to the health plan can be leveraged. These trials hold potential for substantial long-term impact on our ability to generate evidence to improve care and population health.

Funder

Office of Strategic Coordination

National Institutes of Health

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3