Enhancing the use of EHR systems for pragmatic embedded research: lessons from the NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory

Author:

Richesson Rachel L1,Marsolo Keith S2,Douthit Brian J34ORCID,Staman Karen5,Ho P Michael6,Dailey Dana7,Boyd Andrew D8,McTigue Kathleen M9,Ezenwa Miriam O10,Schlaeger Judith M11,Patil Crystal L11,Faurot Keturah R12,Tuzzio Leah13,Larson Eric B13,O’Brien Emily C2,Zigler Christina K2,Lakin Joshua R14,Pressman Alice R15,Braciszewski Jordan M16,Grudzen Corita17,Fiol Guilherme Del18

Affiliation:

1. Department of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

2. Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA

3. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

4. US Department of Veterans Affairs, Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

5. Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA

6. Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Medicine, Denver, Colorado, USA

7. Center for Health Sciences, St. Ambrose University, Davenport, Iowa and Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA

8. Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA

9. Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

10. Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida, College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida, USA

11. Department of Human Development Nursing Science, University of Illinois Chicago, College of Nursing, Chicago, Illinois, USA

12. Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA

13. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA

14. Palliative Medicine, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

15. Center for Health Systems Research, Sutter Health Center for Health Systems Research, Walnut Creek, California, USA

16. Center for Health Policy and Health Services Research, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, USA

17. Department of Emergency Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA

18. Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Abstract

Abstract Objective We identified challenges and solutions to using electronic health record (EHR) systems for the design and conduct of pragmatic research. Materials and Methods Since 2012, the Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory has served as the resource coordinating center for 21 pragmatic clinical trial demonstration projects. The EHR Core working group invited these demonstration projects to complete a written semistructured survey and used an inductive approach to review responses and identify EHR-related challenges and suggested EHR enhancements. Results We received survey responses from 20 projects and identified 21 challenges that fell into 6 broad themes: (1) inadequate collection of patient-reported outcome data, (2) lack of structured data collection, (3) data standardization, (4) resources to support customization of EHRs, (5) difficulties aggregating data across sites, and (6) accessing EHR data. Discussion Based on these findings, we formulated 6 prerequisites for PCTs that would enable the conduct of pragmatic research: (1) integrate the collection of patient-centered data into EHR systems, (2) facilitate structured research data collection by leveraging standard EHR functions, usable interfaces, and standard workflows, (3) support the creation of high-quality research data by using standards, (4) ensure adequate IT staff to support embedded research, (5) create aggregate, multidata type resources for multisite trials, and (6) create re-usable and automated queries. Conclusion We are hopeful our collection of specific EHR challenges and research needs will drive health system leaders, policymakers, and EHR designers to support these suggestions to improve our national capacity for generating real-world evidence.

Funder

National Institutes of Health (NIH) Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory by the NIH Common Fund through cooperative agreement

Office of Strategic Coordination within the Office of the NIH Director

NIH through the NIH HEAL Initiative

NIH Health Care Systems Research Collaboratory

NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices: ABATE Infection

ACP PEACE

EMBED

GGC4H

HiLo

ICD-Pieces

LIRE

Nudge

PPACT

PRIM-ER

PROVEN

SPOT

STOP CRC

TiME

TSOS

Demonstration Projects within the NIH HEAL Initiative were supported by the following cooperative agreements with NIH Institutes, Centers, and Offices: BackInAction

BeatPain Utah

FM TIPS

GRACE

NOHARM

OPTIMUM

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Health Informatics

Cited by 23 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3