Recruitment characteristics of randomised trials in critical care: A systematic review

Author:

Ramanan Mahesh1234ORCID,Kumar Aashish5,Billot Laurent6ORCID,Myburgh John4,Venkatesh Balasubramanian3478

Affiliation:

1. Intensive Care Unit, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, QLD, Australia

2. Adult Intensive Care Services, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia

3. School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

4. Critical Care Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

5. Intensive Care Unit, Logan Hospital, Meadowbrook, QLD, Australia

6. Statistics Division, The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia

7. Intensive Care Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia

8. Intensive Care Unit, Wesley Hospital, Auchenflower, QLD, Australia

Abstract

Background/Aims: To summarise the temporal trends of recruitment and methodological characteristics of critical care randomised controlled trials with the primary outcome of mortality. Methods: PubMed was searched for articles meeting inclusion and exclusion criteria. Randomised controlled trials, with primary outcome of mortality, of adult and paediatric critical care patients treated in an intensive care unit, were included. Neonatal intensive care unit trials, non-English publications and conference proceedings or abstracts without full-length publications were excluded. Duplicate literature search, article selection and quality assessment were performed by two reviewers with disputes resolved through discussion. Data were extracted into a custom-designed Research Electronic Data Capture database. Results: The search identified 67,199 records of which 230 were included. The annual number of critical care randomised controlled trials published increased gradually over a 30-year period from 0 in 1990 to 19 in 2014 with stabilisation at 8–11 between 2015 and 2020. Twenty-seven percent of randomised controlled trials were low risk in all categories using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Methodological characteristics such as registration on clinical trials registries and data safety monitoring committee presence significantly (p < 0.001) increased over time. The median recruitment was 376 patients (interquartile range 125–895) with significant increase (p = 0.002) from 62 (interquartile range: 33–486) in 1991 to 725 (interquartile range: 537–2600) in 2020. This was accompanied by an increase in recruitment times. Thus overall, recruitment rates did not increase. Early cessation occurred in 23% (54/230) of randomised controlled trials with no temporal trend. Conclusion: The number, size and some methodological qualities of critical randomised controlled trials with primary outcome of mortality have increased over time, but rates of recruitment and early cessation have been unchanged.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Pharmacology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3