Preparing Students with Special Needs for Reintegration

Author:

Mathes Patricia G.1,Fuchs Douglas2,Roberts P. Holley3,Fuchs Lynn S.4

Affiliation:

1. Patricia G. Mathes is an assistant professor of special education at Florida State University. She currently conducts classroom-based research on early literacy instruction and on instructional techniques for accommodating students with mild disabilities in general education classrooms. She also is exploring how students with learning disabilities differ from nondisabled students with low academic performance.

2. Douglas Fuchs is a professor of special education and co-director of the Kennedy Center's Institute on Education and Learning at Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. He conducts research to assist teachers in accommodating diverse student needs. Address: Douglas Fuchs, Department of Special Education, Box 328, George Peabody College, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.

3. P. Holley Roberts recently completed her doctoral program in the Department of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University.

4. Lynn S. Fuchs is a professor of special education and co-director of the Kennedy Center's Institute on Education and Learning at Peabody College of Vanderbilt University. She conducts research on teachers' ongoing assessment methods and the effects of instructional planning on student achievement.

Abstract

The original intent of special education pull-out services was to remove students from general education temporarily for intensive, individualized instruction in deficit areas. In many school districts, however, it seems that once students participate in pull-out services, there is little effort to return them to general education. One explanation for this is that not much is known about how best to prepare students for movement up the cascade of services, including reintegration into the mainstream. A promising reintegration approach is transenvironmental programming (TP). Research suggests that supplementing TP with continuous progress monitoring, specifically via curriculum-based measurement (CBM), better prepares students for reintegration than either TP or CBM alone. Findings from the present study provide a possible explanation: Results suggest that special educators using TP who receive CBM information about their students' academic progress are more likely to plan and implement academic interventions in preparation for students' transition than are those special educators who do not receive this information. This supports the hypothesis that the relatively greater success of TP+CBM is due to increased attention to academic preparation. Implications for practice and future research are discussed.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

General Health Professions,Education,Health(social science)

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3