Low Literacy Levels Among U.S. Adults and Difficult Ballot Propositions

Author:

Parker Rebecca L.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, USA

Abstract

High-level literacy skills are required for full participation in the democratic process through voting. Consequently, adults with low-level literacy skills are at a disadvantage. This work investigated the disparity between the readability of U.S. ballot propositions for year 2022 state elections and grade level reading estimates (≤eighth grade) for adults. Educational attainment was also examined. Propositions ( n = 140) from 38 states were included. Mean readability was 18 (range 7.0-64.0). Only four measures (3%) fell within range of national estimates for adult reading ability. Thirty-nine percent of adults completed high school or less, yet 74% of ballots were written well above a high school reading level. There is a discrepancy between the literacy skills of the average voter and the readability of most propositions. The findings of this study have important implications for individuals with learning disabilities. Policy changes and educational support efforts should be initiated.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Reference79 articles.

1. Adams A. L. (2020). Nonpartisan election information. Public Services Quarterly, 16(2), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228959.2020.1737626

2. Aksan N., Kisac B. (2009). A descriptive study: Reading comprehension and cognitive awareness skills. Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 834–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.149

3. Baer J., Kutner M., Sabatini J., White S. (2009). Basic reading skills and the literacy of America’s least literate adults: Results from the 2003 national assessment of adult literacy (NAAL) supplemental studies (NCES 2009–481). National Center for Education Statistics. http://ies.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2009481

4. Ballotpedia. (2022, October). Ballot measure readability scores, 2022. https://ballotpedia.org/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2022

5. Belt R. (2016). Contemporary voting rights controversies through the lens of disability. SSRN Electronic Journal. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2780693

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3