Abstract
This article uses the concept of “political pharmacology” to show that drugs are complex and mutable entities, the constitution of which is as much a political (power) issue as it is a technical one. The article analyzes the negotiations and struggles that have been involved in the constitution of methadone and heroin as maintenance drugs in Denmark. Danish drug policy on medical-maintenance treatment was for many years dominated by a medico-administrative technocracy. But from the mid-1990s, this technocracy, and the way it defined maintenance treatment and maintenance drugs, was challenged by drug users and other actors. They were, among other things, dissatisfied with the medical constitution of maintenance drugs as “stabilizing medications” and demanded that the drugs should also be allowed to function as “intoxicating substances.”
Subject
Law,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Health Policy,Health(social science)
Cited by
24 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献