Abstract
Purpose
Internet use has changed the mechanics of drug dealing. Although this has spurred some initial academic interest in how markets and their users have been changing, the issue is still under-researched. The purpose of this paper is to understand how the organisation of the distribution of prescription drugs and other illegal drugs overlap in these online markets by analysing data gathered from observation of the Swedish Facebook drug market and its participants.
Design/methodology/approach
Data were gathered during three months of digital ethnography conducted among Swedish Facebook posters supplemented by 25 interviews with sellers (20) and buyers (5). Screenshots and interview data were coded by carrying out an NVivo-based content analysis. The analysis is based on descriptive statistics of drug types, co-occurrence with other drugs, group size and the demographic characteristics of sellers. Additionally, the interviewees’ descriptions of the marketplace and their drug dealing or buying activities were included in the analysis.
Findings
In total, 57 Swedish Facebook groups that sold illegal substances were located. The groups rarely specialised in specific drug types, but were convened around demographic factors, such as specific cities and locales. The sales of prescription drugs were part of the overall activity of groups selling other illegal drugs, but they were more often sold in separate Facebook posts, possibly by specialist sellers. Swedish Facebook sales primarily concerned alprazolam, tramadol, pregabalin and clonazepam, and were sold by both professional and amateur sellers.
Originality/value
This study reports findings from a Nordic comparative study on social media drug dealing, representing the first in-depth study of digitally mediated prescription drug dealing outside of cryptomarkets.
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference53 articles.
1. Hidden wholesale: the drug diffusing capacity of online drug cryptomarkets;International Journal of Drug Policy,2016
2. Will growth in cryptomarket drug buying increase the harms of illicit drugs?;Addiction,2018
3. Altheide, D., Coyle, M., Devriese, K. and Schneider, C. (2008), “Emergent qualitative document analysis”, in Hesse-Biber, S.N. and Leavy, P. (Eds), Handbook of Emergent Methods, The Guilford Press, New York, NY, pp. 127-51.
4. ‘Gain with no pain’: anabolic-androgenic steroids trafficking in the UK;European Journal of Criminology,2016
5. Sellers risk perception in public and private social media drug markets;International Journal of Drug Policy,2019
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献