Phase 4 Safety and Efficacy Study of Antihemophilic Factor (Recombinant) in Previously Treated Chinese Patients With Severe/Moderately Severe Hemophilia A

Author:

Zhao Yongqiang1,Hu Yu2,Jin Jie3,Zhao Xielan4,Wang Xuefeng5,Wu Runhui6,Wu Depei7,Yang Renchi8,Yang Feng’e9,Hu Qun10,Wang Juan11,Fang Hai12ORCID,Engl Werner13

Affiliation:

1. Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China

2. Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong, Wuhan, China

3. The First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

4. Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China

5. Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China

6. Beijing Children’s Hospital, Capital University of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China

7. The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China

8. Blood Diseases Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Tianjin, China

9. Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China

10. Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China

11. Cangzhou Central Hospital, Cangzhou, China

12. Shire BioScience (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., a Takeda Company, Shanghai, China

13. Baxalta Innovations GmbH, a Takeda Company, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Antihemophilic factor (recombinant) (rAHF; ADVATE®; Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA) is indicated for the treatment and prevention of bleeding in patients with hemophilia A. We aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of standard prophylaxis versus on-demand treatment with rAHF in previously treated Chinese patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A. This open-label, sequential, interventional, postapproval study (NCT02170402) conducted in China included patients of any age with hemophilia A with factor VIII (FVIII) level ≤2%. Patients received 6 months’ on-demand rAHF then 6 months’ rAHF prophylaxis (20-40 IU/kg every 48 ± 6 hours). The primary objective was percentage reduction in annualized bleeding rate (ABR) in the per-protocol analysis set (PPAS); secondary objectives included ABR by bleeding subtype, hemostatic efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety. Of 72 patients who received ≥1 rAHF dose, 61 were included in the PPAS. Total ABR was lower during prophylaxis (mean 2.5, 95% CI 1.5-3.7; median 0) versus on-demand treatment (mean 58.3, 95% CI 52.5-64.7; median 53.9), representing a 95.9% risk reduction. Similar findings in favor of prophylaxis were observed for all types of bleeding event by cause and location. rAHF hemostatic efficacy was rated as “excellent”/“good” in 96.1% of treated bleeding events. Transient FVIII inhibitors (0.6-1.7 BU) in 4 patients resolved before study end; no unexpected safety issues were observed. rAHF prophylaxis in this study of previously treated Chinese patients with severe/moderately severe hemophilia A resulted in a clear reduction in bleeding events versus rAHF on-demand treatment, with no change in safety profile.

Funder

Baxalta Innovations GmbH, a Takeda company, Vienna, Austria

Baxalta US Inc., a Takeda company, Lexington, MA, USA

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Hematology,General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3