Abstract
The application of distance learning to urban planning holds promise for reaching a broader planning education audience. While technology can bridge the gap between the classroomand the remote learner, the distance learner may be denied the opportunity of face-to-face communication, collaboration and inter-action when the traditional classroom experience is abandoned. This may not be in the best interest of students nor the clients assisted in the planning process. This article investigates the concern that technology-enhanced distance learning will reduce student experiences in communicating with others, collaborating on projects, and interacting with students, faculty and clients—group processes typically experienced in the classroom setting. It concludes that the pursuit of distance learning may not be in the best interest of the profession if it cuts short essential student experiences.
Subject
Urban Studies,Development,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference5 articles.
1. Distance Education: a Bibliographic Review for Educational Planners and Policymakers 1992-2002
2. Learning at a Distance
3. O’Leary, M. 2000. Distance learning and libraries. Online 24 (4): 94-96.
4. Smith, Glenn Gordon, David Ferguson, and Mieke Caris. 2001. Teaching college courses online vs face-to-face. The Journal: Technological Horizons in Education 28 (9): 18-26.
5. Comparing In-Class and Computer-Mediated Discussion Using a Communicative Action Framework
Cited by
13 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献