A Critique of Methods for Operationalizing the Concept of Fakeability

Author:

Gordon Michael E.1,Gross Ronald H.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Tennessee

2. General Electric Company

Abstract

Past practice of operationalizing the concept of fakeability is reviewed. The strengths and weaknesses of these indices (mean difference, percent overlap, percent agreement, correlation, and variance of difference scores) are discussed in the light of a proposed new definition of fakeability based upon Naylor's (1967) model of measurement accuracy.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Datenerhebung;Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften;2023

2. Methods of Measuring Faking Behavior;Human Performance;2011-09

3. What If We Fake Emotional Intelligence? A Test of Criterion Validity Attenuation;Journal of Personality Assessment;2011-04-20

4. RECONSIDERING THE USE OF PERSONALITY TESTS IN PERSONNEL SELECTION CONTEXTS;Personnel Psychology;2007-09

5. Psychological Testing: An Introduction, 2nd Edition;2006

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3