Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict-Handling Behavior: The "Mode" Instrument

Author:

Kilmann Ralph H.1,Thomas Kenneth W.2

Affiliation:

1. University of Pittsburgh

2. University of California, Los Angeles

Abstract

This paper describes the rationale and development of a new measure of five interpersonal conflict-handling modes (competing, collaborating, compromising, avoiding, and accommodating), which attempts to control for the social desirability response bias. The instrument is entitled: "Management-of-Differences Exercise," or the MODE instrument. The results of this study indicate that the new instrument significantly reduces the social desirability bias for overall population tendencies in comparison to three other conflict behavior instruments, although all four instruments may still be susceptible to some individual tendencies in this response bias. This study also investigated other aspects of substantive validity and structural validity. Lastly, this paper presented emerging evidence on external validity, which, while encouraging, suggests the need for continuing research efforts to investigate this aspect of validity for the new MODE instrument.

Publisher

SAGE Publications

Subject

Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education

Cited by 346 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Perceived competences, attitudes, and training needs in conflict management among a cohort of Italian physiotherapists: A cross-sectional survey study;PLOS ONE;2024-07-26

2. A SOCIO-PSYCHOLOGICAL APPROACH TO IMPROVING METHODS OF MANAGING INTERPERSONAL CONFLICTS IN PUBLIC SERVICE IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY;MOSCOW ECONOMIC JOURNAL;2024-07-26

3. A Preliminary Study of the Impact of Personality on Satisfaction in Group Contexts;Adjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization;2024-06-27

4. A Preliminary Analysis on Self and Peer Evaluation of Personality Models for Recommender Systems;Adjunct Proceedings of the 32nd ACM Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization;2024-06-27

5. AI-Driven Mediation Strategies for Audience Depolarisation in Online Debates;Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems;2024-05-11

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3