Affiliation:
1. University of West Florida
Abstract
Previous research on the semantic differential technique has found evidence for variance in Osgood's original formulation of three dimensions of connotative meaning: namely, Evaluation, Potency, and Activity. Piotrowski (1983a) reported on the inconsistency in factor structure with the exception of the Evaluative dimension. The present investigation reports retest data based on Piotrowski's original sample, after a 6-month time span. Three concepts (Hurricane, My City, and Myself) were analyzed in a fifth grade population. The results indicated support for the stability and consistency of the Evaluation dimension only. There was moderate consistency in scales which comprised the Potency and Activity dimensions. Researchers were cautioned about utilizing scales found valid in previous investigations.
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Applied Psychology,Developmental and Educational Psychology,Education
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献