Affiliation:
1. Rutgers University at Camden
Abstract
Mediation is rapidly becoming the dispute resolution technique of choice in public administration. This researche xamines the ways in whichfeder al mediators approachdis pute resolution in labormanagement relations. The analyses are based on semistructured interviews that were conducted with 15 mediators at the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS). Mediators’descriptions of the mediation process are evaluated withr espect to three models: problem solving, transformative, and bifocal. Given the success of the FMCS at mediating a widening variety of disputes, the results of this study should generalize to other dispute resolution contexts. Practical implications of this research are as follows: (a) Mediators should adopt a bifocal approach, simultaneously attending to overarching relationship issues as well as the concrete, immediate issues in dispute; (b) the parties to a dispute must be actively engaged in the mediation process; (c) conflict resolution and collaborative problem solving is a long-term affair; and (d) public administrators involved in dispute resolution and collaborative problem solving should be prepared to take small steps.
Subject
Marketing,Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference51 articles.
1. Albrecht, K. (1994). The power of bifocal vision. Management Review, 83(4), 42-46.
2. Antes, J. R., Folger, J. P. & Noce, D. J. D. (2001). Transforming conflict interactions in the workplace: Documented effects of the USPS Redress Program. Hofstra Labor& Employment Law Journal, 18,429-467.
3. Suggestions for capturing corporate vision in strategic information systems
4. Educational policy planning and globalisation
5. Mediating Employment Disputes
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献